§

T.I.M.E.-DC, Inc.

203 N.L.R.B. 1141 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
T.I.M.E.-DC, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Joseph Antell, Inc.

    358 F.2d 880 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 26 times
    In Antell, the court stated that the smallness of a plant, or a staff, may be material as bearing on the knowledge on the part of the employer of an employee's union activities, but only to the extent that it may be shown to have made it likely that the employer observed, or otherwise learned about the activity in question.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Harry F. Berggren Sons, Inc.

    406 F.2d 239 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 15 times
    Enforcing the Board's finding that an employer violated Section 8 by conducting a formal "poll" which took place in a non-coercive atmosphere, but which met only four of the five components of the Struksnes standard

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times

    No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Hilton Mobile Homes

    387 F.2d 7 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 10 times
    In NLRB v. Hilton Mobile Homes, 387 F.2d 7 (8 Cir. 1967), the employer offered a discharged employee reinstatement, but without seniority rights.

  5. Hensley v. United Transports, Inc.

    346 F. Supp. 1108 (N.D. Tex. 1972)   Cited 5 times

    No. CA-5-932. August 21, 1972. John Edward Price, Center, Colo., for plaintiff. Buddy Wright, Law Offices of Tom Upchurch, Jr., Fort Worth, Tex., Robert L. Templeton, Amarillo, Tex., for defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION WOODWARD, District Judge. The above case was called for trial on the 10th day of August, 1972, in Lubbock, Texas, and there appeared in open court each of the parties and their attorneys and all parties announced ready for trial, with the exception of the defendant Union, Local No.

  6. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,061 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB