Tiffany & Broadway, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.
476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973) Cited 188 times 30 Legal Analyses
Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"
Kenner Parker Toys v. Rose Art Industries
963 F.2d 350 (Fed. Cir. 1992) Cited 49 times
Holding that in light of the appearance, sound and meaning of the marks PLAY-DOH and FUNDOUGH, consumers may receive the "same commercial impression" from the marks
In re Hyper Shoppes (Ohio), Inc.
837 F.2d 463 (Fed. Cir. 1988) Cited 10 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding similarity between furniture and "general merchandise store services," and rejecting the distinction between goods and services as having "little or no legal significance"
Tiffany and Company v. National Gypsum Co.
459 F.2d 527 (C.C.P.A. 1972) Cited 11 times
Upholding Tiffany Co.'s opposition to registration of "TIFFANY" for wood fiber acoustic ceiling tiles "taking into account the fame of its mark."
Tiffany Co. v. Tiffany Tile Corporation
345 F.2d 214 (C.C.P.A. 1965) Cited 5 times
Patent Appeal No. 7364. May 20, 1965. Rehearing Denied July 1, 1965. S. Stephen Baker, New York City, for appellant. Boynton P. Livingston, G. Cabell Busick, Washington D.C. (James L. Kurtz, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellee. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, SMITH, and ALMOND, Judges. WORLEY, Chief Judge. Tiffany Tile Corp. seeks registration of "Tiffany Tile" for use on ceramic tile which it manufactures and sells through distributors. Tiffany Co. opposes on forty-seven registrations
Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration
15 U.S.C. § 1052 Cited 1,584 times 270 Legal Analyses
Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"

Tiffany & Broadway, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"

Kenner Parker Toys v. Rose Art Industries

Holding that in light of the appearance, sound and meaning of the marks PLAY-DOH and FUNDOUGH, consumers may receive the "same commercial impression" from the marks

In re Hyper Shoppes (Ohio), Inc.

Finding similarity between furniture and "general merchandise store services," and rejecting the distinction between goods and services as having "little or no legal significance"

Tiffany and Company v. National Gypsum Co.

Upholding Tiffany Co.'s opposition to registration of "TIFFANY" for wood fiber acoustic ceiling tiles "taking into account the fame of its mark."

Tiffany Co. v. Tiffany Tile Corporation

Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"