§

Tiffany and Company, Tiffany & Co. and its affiliated companies and subsidiaries

01-CA-111287 (N.L.R.B. Aug. 5, 2014)
Tiffany and Company, Tiffany & Co. and its affiliated companies and subsidiaries

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Frankl v. HTH Corp.

    693 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 32 times
    Holding that employer withheld requested documents in bad faith where union repeatedly explained why limited production was inadequate and where union signed confidentiality agreement to address employer’s concerns

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. New Vista Nursing & Rehab.

    719 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2013)   Cited 28 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “ ‘the Recess of the Senate’ means only intersession breaks,” and, therefore, “that [Board] Member Becker's appointment was invalid”

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Enter. Leasing Co.

    722 F.3d 609 (4th Cir. 2013)   Cited 15 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Finding the “pro forma” recess appointments invalid

  5. Cintas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    482 F.3d 463 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 13 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding National Labor Relations Board determination that an employer's rule that was likely to chill employees' discussion of wages constituted an unfair labor practice under the NLRA

  6. Paulsen ex rel. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. All Am. Sch. Bus Corp.

    967 F. Supp. 2d 630 (E.D.N.Y. 2013)   Cited 4 times
    Describing the financial emotional harm to the individual workers and explaining that "[t]hese types of ongoing financial and emotional hardships to the union members, and their resulting antagonism toward the union caused by the implementation of the best and final offer, adversely affects the union's ability to protect the collective bargaining rights of its members and cannot be remedied by money damages awarded only after a final decision"

  7. Hooks v. Kitsap Tenant Support Servs., Inc.

    CASE NO. C13-5470 BHS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 13, 2013)   Cited 3 times   5 Legal Analyses

    CASE NO. C13-5470 BHS 08-13-2013 RONALD K. HOOKS, Regional Director of the Nineteenth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. KITSAP TENANT SUPPORT SERVICES, INC., Respondent. BENJAMIN H. SETTLE ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS This matter comes before the Court on Respondent Kitsap Tenant Support Services, Inc.'s ("Kitsap") motion to dismiss (Dkt. 12). The Court has considered the pleadings filed in support

  8. Nevada Service Emp. Union v. N.L.R.B

    358 F. App'x 783 (9th Cir. 2009)

    Nos. 08-70234, 08-70793, 08-71242. Argued and Submitted October 7, 2009. Filed November 17, 2009. Glenn Rothner, Esquire, Lisa Demidovich, Rothner, Segall Greenstone, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner. Cornele A. Overstreet, Esquire, NLRB-National Labor Relations Board, Phoenix, AZ, Joel C. Schochet, Esquire, NLRB-National Labor Relations Board, Las Vegas, NV, Regional Director, Esquire, National Labor Relations Board, Los Angeles, CA, Raymond Carey, Foley Lardner, LLP, Detroit, MI, for Respondent. Christopher