§

Tidewater Express Lines, Inc.

142 N.L.R.B. 1111 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Tidewater Express Lines, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 325 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Dalton Brick Tile Corporation

    301 F.2d 886 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 18 times

    No. 18765. April 13, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Richard J. Scupi, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Erle Phillips, John Bacheller, Jr., Fisher Phillips, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and CAMERON and BROWN, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. The question presented here is whether, during the time bargaining for a collective

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease

  5. Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    270 F.2d 40 (3d Cir. 1959)   Cited 11 times
    In Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. NLRB, 270 F.2d 40, 43 (3d Cir. 1959), the court, in sustaining the Board's finding that a shut-down by the employer was not motivated by a fear that a sudden strike would endanger plant and personnel, stated that "to apply hindsight in the light of what later occurred would not be a true assessment of the company's motives.

  6. Tidewater v. Freight Drivers

    187 A.2d 685 (Md. 1963)   Cited 4 times

    [No. 139, September Term, 1962.] Decided January 29, 1963. EQUITY — Injunctions Against Labor Strike — Code (1957), Art. 100, § 65, Forbids Even Though It Is Violation Of Contract. Code (1957), Art. 100, § 65, forbids a court of equity from issuing an injunction against a labor strike even though there is a contract against strikes between the employer and the union. In the instant case, there was no claim that there was any fraud or violence or threat of either and the Court held that no injunction

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Jackson Maintenance Corporation

    283 F.2d 569 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 5 times

    No. 40, Docket 26255. Argued October 4, 1960. Decided October 28, 1960. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Elliott Moore, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Friedlander Gaines, New York City (Henry G. Friedlander, Norbert Ruttenberg, Edward Cherney, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Before HINCKS, WATERMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN

  8. The Point Reyes

    110 F.2d 608 (5th Cir. 1940)   Cited 2 times

    No. 9311. March 19, 1940. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Wayne G. Borah, Judge. Libel in rem for bonus money alleged to be due under a contract of employment by M.L. Arnold and others against the Gulf Pacific Line, Swayne Hoyt, Limited, managing owners, and claimants of the S.S. "Point Reyes". From a decree of the District Court, 28 F. Supp. 273, dismissing the libel, M.L. Arnold and others appeal. Affirmed. W.J. Waguespack, of New Orleans

  9. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,104 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"