§

Tidewater Construction Corp.

341 N.L.R.B. 456 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Tidewater Construction Corp.

8 Cited authorities

  1. American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

    380 U.S. 300 (1965)   Cited 350 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Southwest Merchandising Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    53 F.3d 1334 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that the jury could infer pretext and unlawful discrimination from an employer's shifting and inconsistent explanations for its action

  5. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  6. Intern. Union of Operating Eng. v. N.L.R.B

    294 F.3d 186 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 5 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 01-1301. Argued May 16, 2002. Decided July 9, 2002. Richard F. Griffin argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Helen L. Morgan and Elizabeth A. Nadeau. John M. Singleton entered an appearance. William M. Bernstein, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Frederick Havard

  7. International Paper Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    115 F.3d 1045 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 3 times

    No. 95-1606 Argued October 24, 1996 Decided June 27, 1997 Stephen M. Shapiro argued the cause for the petitioner. Timothy S. Bishop and Andrew E. Zelman were on brief. Evan M. Tager entered an appearance. David A. Fleischer, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for the respondent. Linda R. Sher, Associate General Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, were on brief. Robert D. Kurnick argued the cause for the intervenors and for amicus curiae AFL-CIO

  8. Property Resources Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    863 F.2d 964 (D.C. Cir. 1988)   Cited 8 times
    Stating that the Board "can infer from falsity of employer's stated reason for discharge that motive is unlawful" (citing Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. NLRB , 362 F.2d 466, 470 (9th Cir. 1966) )