10 Cited authorities
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 871 timesHolding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.
373 U.S. 221 (1963) Cited 358 times 1 Legal AnalysesUpholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.
94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938) Cited 178 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.
Local 833, Uaw-Afl-Cio, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
300 F.2d 699 (D.C. Cir. 1962) Cited 40 timesNos. 15961, 16031, 16182. Argued September 11, 1961. Decided January 26, 1962. Certiorari Denied June 4, 1962. See 82 S.Ct. 1258. Mr. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., Washington, D.C., and Mr. Louis H. Pollak, New Haven, Conn., of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Connecticut, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. John Silard, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for Local 833, UAW-AFL-CIO, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, petitioner
Lakeland Bus Lines, Incorporated v. N.L.R.B
278 F.2d 888 (3d Cir. 1960) Cited 12 timesIn Lakeland Bus Lines, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 278 F.2d 888, 892 (C.A.3), the court said: "An order directing reinstatement with back pay requires a good faith reinstatement."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Quest-Shon Mark B
185 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1950) Cited 18 timesNo. 17, Docket 21624. Argued October 4, 1950. Decided November 9, 1950. Owsley Vose, Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George H. Plaut, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Adolph I. King, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard P. Walsh, Washington, D.C., and Angelo A. Tumminelli, Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for respondent. Before LEARNED HAND, Chief
N.L.R.B. v. Trinity Valley Iron and Steel Co.
290 F.2d 47 (5th Cir. 1961) Cited 6 timesNo. 18553. May 2, 1961. Melvin Pollack, Atty., Marcel Mallet Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Peter M. Giesey, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John Edward Price, Brown, Herman, Scott Young, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and BROWN, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. On June 8 the Employees commenced an economic strike. On June 30, from conduct occurring
White Sulphur Springs Company v. N.L.R.B
316 F.2d 410 (D.C. Cir. 1963) Cited 2 timesNo. 16966. Argued September 13, 1962. Decided March 7, 1963. Mr. Paul S. Hudgins, Bluefield, W. Va., with whom Mr. Edward A. Martin, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Draper Corp.
159 F.2d 294 (1st Cir. 1947) Cited 7 timesStating that remedial principles "require reinstatement of the employee to his former position wherever possible, but if such position is no longer in existence then to a substantially equivalent position"