§

The Warren Co, Inc.

90 N.L.R.B. 689 (N.L.R.B. 1950)
The Warren Co, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 505 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  3. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  4. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 251 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  5. Labor Board v. Bradford Dyeing Assn

    310 U.S. 318 (1940)   Cited 150 times
    Construing "affecting commerce"

  6. Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    176 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1949)   Cited 64 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plain and unambiguous text must be applied as written without resort to construction

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Chicago Apparatus Co.

    116 F.2d 753 (7th Cir. 1941)   Cited 35 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Chicago Apparatus Co., 116 F.2d 753, 756, and National Labor Relations Board v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 83, cases cited and relied upon by the defendant, such a written designation had been obtained.

  8. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Piqua M. W. Prod

    109 F.2d 552 (6th Cir. 1940)   Cited 28 times
    In N. L. R. B. v. Piqua Munising Wood Products Co., 109 F.2d 552, 557, the United States Circuit Court said: "All that is requisite in a valid complaint before the Board is that there be a plain statement of the things claimed to constitute an unfair labor practice that respondent may be put upon his defense."

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Consol. Mach. Tool

    163 F.2d 376 (2d Cir. 1947)   Cited 15 times

    No. 236, Docket 20516. July 25, 1947. Writ of Certiorari Denied November 17, 1947. See 68 S.Ct. 164. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board, petitioner, against the Consolidated Machine Tool Corporation, respondent, for enforcement of the petitioner's order requiring respondent to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices and to bargain collectively with Pattern Makers League of North America, A.F. of L. Enforcement granted of the order as modified. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Clarksburg Pub. Co.

    120 F.2d 976 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 18 times

    No. 4772. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against the Clarksburg Publishing Company for enforcement of a cease and desist order. Order modified and affirmed. David Findling, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Richard C. Barrett, and Ralph Winkler, all of