§

The Walden Woods Project

No. 77684176 (T.T.A.B. Sep. 28, 2012)
The Walden Woods Project

6 Cited authorities

  1. Valentine Sugars Inc. v. Donau Corp.

    509 U.S. 923 (1993)   Cited 114 times
    Explaining that in determining whether arbitrator exceeded jurisdiction, court resolves all doubts in favor of arbitration

  2. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

    476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 191 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"

  3. DeCosta v. Viacom Intern., Inc.

    981 F.2d 602 (1st Cir. 1992)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that, where the court had already presumed secondary meaning, USPTO registration "adds nothing significantly new" and that the Lanham Act does not "make it easier for a registrant . . . to prove that a relevant buying public may confuse some other person's mark with his own"

  4. In re Dixie Restaurants, Inc.

    105 F.3d 1405 (Fed. Cir. 1997)   Cited 34 times
    Holding that DELTA is the dominant portion of the mark THE DELTA CAFÉ where the disclaimed word CAFÉ is descriptive of applicant's restaurant services

  5. Federated Foods v. Fort Howard Paper Co.

    544 F.2d 1098 (C.C.P.A. 1976)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the mere existence of modern supermarket containing wide variety or products should not foreclose further inquiry into the likelihood of confusion arising from the use of similar marks on any goods so displayed

  6. J.C. Hall Company v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.

    340 F.2d 960 (C.C.P.A. 1965)   Cited 26 times

    Patent Appeal No. 7310. February 11, 1965. Albert H. Kirchner, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Robert D. Hovey, Kansas City, Mo., for appellee. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, SMITH and ALMOND, Judges. ALMOND, Judge. J.C. Hall Company filed application to register "HALLMARK" for blank checks issued in single and book form, alleging use since April 17, 1933. Registration has been opposed by Hallmark Cards, Incorporated, alleging prior and continuous use of the identical term "HALLMARK"