The Wackenhut Corporation d/b/a G4S
4 Cited authorities
National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C
532 U.S. 706 (2001) Cited 180 times 29 Legal AnalysesHolding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit
Maine Yankee Atomic, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
624 F.2d 347 (1st Cir. 1980) Cited 36 timesFinding workers to be supervisors even though their tasks and responsibilities were governed "to a great extent" by federal guidelines and company policies
Oil, Chemical Atomic Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B
445 F.2d 237 (D.C. Cir. 1971) Cited 22 times 1 Legal AnalysesNos. 23295, 23300, 23750, 23751. Argued November 3, 1970. Decided May 27, 1971. Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., for petitioner in Nos. 23,295 and 23,300. Mr. Marvin J. Martin, with whom Mr. W. Stanley Churchill, Wichita, Kan., was on the brief, for petitioner in Nos. 23,750 and 23,751 and intervenor in Nos. 23,295 and 23,300. Mr. Joseph E. Mayer, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, for respondent. Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel
Section 73.55 - Requirements for physical protection of licensed activities in nuclear power reactors against radiological sabotage
10 C.F.R. § 73.55 Cited 15 times 2 Legal AnalysesOutlining physical protection requirements to protect against radiological sabotage