15 Cited authorities
Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.
363 U.S. 574 (1960) Cited 5,612 times 6 Legal AnalysesHolding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”
Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.
370 U.S. 238 (1962) Cited 783 timesHolding that a court should decide whether a clause providing for arbitration of various "grievances" covers claims for damages for breach of a no-strike agreement
Drake Bakeries v. Bakery Workers
370 U.S. 254 (1962) Cited 286 timesHolding that because parties had failed to carve out the issue in question from the arbitration clause, it needed to be arbitrated
Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.
356 U.S. 342 (1958) Cited 296 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
NLRB v. Item Co.
220 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1955) Cited 36 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Item Company, 220 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1955), this court held that an employer had no confidentiality privilege to withhold from the union relevant wage data, "which the union's own employee-members apparently refused to disclose to it."
National Labor Rel. Board v. J.H. Allison Co.
165 F.2d 766 (6th Cir. 1948) Cited 44 timesNo. 10411. January 26, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board, for enforcement of its order directing J.H. Allison Co. to cease and desist from refusing to bargain collectively concerning so-called "merit wage increases" with a labor union, as exclusive representative and bargaining agent of its production workers and to grant no merit wage increases to such employees without prior consultation with the union
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yawman & Erbe Mfg. Co.
187 F.2d 947 (2d Cir. 1951) Cited 34 timesNo. 107, Docket 21789. Argued February 7, 1951. Decided March 28, 1951. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Raymond M. Norton, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Nixon, Hargrave, Middleton Devans, Rochester, N.Y., for respondent; Arthur L. Stern and William H. Morris, Rochester, N Y, of counsel. Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRANK,
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works
217 F.2d 593 (4th Cir. 1954) Cited 25 timesNo. 6883. November 18, 1954. Decided December 8, 1954. Frederick U. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and James A. Ryan, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Pierce Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a petition by the National Labor
J.I. Case Company v. National Labor Rel. Board
253 F.2d 149 (7th Cir. 1958) Cited 20 timesIn J.I. Case we simply noted that a union has, absent a showing of relevance, no "`per se' right to information" it requests from an employer during the course of collective bargaining.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Knight Morley Corp.
251 F.2d 753 (6th Cir. 1958) Cited 20 timesHolding that § 502's purpose was to give employees a right to walk off the job because of abnormally dangerous conditions "even in the face of a no-strike clause in their contract with an employer"