The Tampa Tribune

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Mike Yurosek Son, Inc.

    53 F.3d 261 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that four employees who protested reduction in hours and then later refused a contradictory order to work longer hours engaged in concerted activity
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thor Power Tool Co.

    351 F.2d 584 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 68 times
    Concluding that "when the entire record is considered there was substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that [employee's] discharge was the result of his having presented a grievance to the management" even though employee was overheard referring to company's superintendent as "the horse's ass" and was thereafter summarily discharged
  5. Media General Operations, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    394 F.3d 207 (4th Cir. 2005)   Cited 7 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employee who called his employer a "racist," "b_____d," and "red-neck son-of-a-b___h" fell outside of § 7 because he committed acts "of such a serious character as to render [him] unfit for further service"
  6. Felix Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    251 F.3d 1051 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 6 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Felix, an employee telephoned his supervisor to inquire about additional wages the employer owed him for working night shifts.
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Certified Grocers of California

    587 F.2d 449 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 6 times

    No. 77-1624. December 7, 1978. Joseph P. Norelli (argued), Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Paul Causey (argued), of McLaughlin Irvin, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WALLACE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and INGRAM, District Judge. The Honorable William A. Ingram, United States District Judge, Northern District of California, sitting by designation. J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations