§

The Sweetlake Land and Oil Co, Inc.

138 N.L.R.B. 155 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
The Sweetlake Land and Oil Co, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Farmers Irrigation Co. v. McComb

    337 U.S. 755 (1949)   Cited 145 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Farmers Reservoir, for example, the Supreme Court concluded that "the physical operation, control and maintenance" of "canals, reservoirs, and headgates" for a company that stored water and distributed it to farms through the company's canals were activities "[c]learly... not done on a farm."

  2. Bowie v. Gonzalez

    117 F.2d 11 (1st Cir. 1941)   Cited 96 times
    In Bowie v. Gonzalez, 1 Cir., 117 F.2d 11, 20, the Circuit Court of Appeals held "dead" season employees who were "engaged in the repair and maintenance of the milling and transportation facilities" of a company engaged in gathering and refining sugar cane, were covered by the Act.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Textile Mach. Works

    214 F.2d 929 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 35 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Textile Machine Works, Inc., 1954, 214 F.2d 929 this court held that a complaint against Textile, alleging violations by it of Section 8(a)(1), (3), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a)(1), (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, was barred by the time limitation imposed by Section 10(b), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(b), where workers had requested reinstatement rather than employment as new employees.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Cambria Clay Prod

    215 F.2d 48 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 35 times

    No. 12072. July 7, 1954. Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, Thomas R. Haley, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio (J. Mack Swigert, Charles D. Lindberg, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief; Miller, Searl Fitch, Portsmouth, Ohio, of counsel), for respondent. Before McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and GOURLEY, District Judge. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  5. Mitchell v. Huntsville Wholesale Nurseries

    267 F.2d 286 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that the processing by a farmer of commodities of other farmers is incidental to, or in conjunction with, the farming operations of those other farmers and therefore not within the definition of agriculture

  6. Mitchell v. Hunt

    263 F.2d 913 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 21 times
    Considering the FLSA's exemption for agricultural employees and stating: "To bring himself within the exception, the appellee must prove that not merely some but substantially all of the farming operations to which the practices are incident were operations of the appellee farmer himself."

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Olaa Sugar Co.

    242 F.2d 714 (9th Cir. 1957)   Cited 13 times

    No. 15143. March 12, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Rosanna Blake, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arthur G. Smith, Smith, Wild, Beebe Cades, J. Edward Collins, James A. King, Bouslog Symonds, Honolulu, Hawaii, and George Andersen, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and STEPHENS and POPE, Circuit Judges. POPE, Circuit Judge. Before us is the petition