§

The Standard Oil Co.

137 N.L.R.B. 690 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
The Standard Oil Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  2. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  3. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  4. Litteral v. Indem. Ins. of N.A.

    370 U.S. 919 (1962)   Cited 62 times

    No. 949. June 11, 1962. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. C. E. Tate and John Alan Appleman for petitioners. Horace E. Gunn for respondent. Reported below: 300 F. 2d 340.

  5. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Deena Artware

    198 F.2d 645 (6th Cir. 1952)   Cited 43 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc., 198 F.2d 645, this Court granted an order of enforcement similar to one in the case now before us. The Board's Supplemental Decision and Order for the payment of back wages was enforced in that case by this Court in National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Incorporated, reported at 228 F.2d 871.

  6. United States Pipe and Foundry Co. v. N.L.R.B

    298 F.2d 873 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 11 times
    In United States Pipe and Foundry Co. v. N.L.R.B., 298 F.2d 873, 877-78 (5th Cir. 1962), the court held that a union's insistence during bargaining on a common expiration date for its own as well as its sister unions' contracts was not unlawful.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kentucky Util. Co.

    182 F.2d 810 (6th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Kentucky Utilities Co., 6 Cir., 182 F.2d 810, we recognized the right of management to refuse to bargain with a certain representative of the Union under unusual facts clearly justifying such refusal.

  8. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Roscoe Skipper

    213 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 6 times

    No. 14885. June 18, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Rose Mary Filipowicz, Atty., N.L.R.B., George J. Bott. General Counsel, Owsley Vose, John C. Rohrbaugh, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. E. Kontz Bennett, Waycross, Ga. (Bennett, Pedrick Bennett, Waycross, Ga., of counsel), for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DAWKINS, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. This small tempest

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Retail Clerks International Ass'n

    203 F.2d 165 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 7 times

    No. 12434. March 31, 1953. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Frederick U. Reel and Robert G. Johnson, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Roland C. Davis, J.D. Burdick and Carroll Davis, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent Retail Clerks Int. Ass'n. Elisha Hanson, Washington, D.C., Willard S. Johnston, and Orrick, Dahlquist, Neff Herrington, San