§
The Singer Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,675 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Myers v. Bethlehem Corp.

    303 U.S. 41 (1938)   Cited 1,426 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that exhaustion of administrative remedies mandated before seeking injunctive relief in court

  3. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  4. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

  5. Dyer v. MacDougall

    201 F.2d 265 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 321 times
    Holding that witness demeanor may persuade a jury to "assume the truth of what he denied," but a court cannot allow a case to go to the jury on such evidence

  6. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Great E. Color Lithographic Corp.

    309 F.2d 352 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 21 times

    No. 53, Docket 27470. Argued October 19, 1962. Decided November 1, 1962. A. Brummel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallett-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, and Melvin Pollack, Washington, D.C., on the brief) for petitioner. James E. Birdsall of Warner Birdsall, New York City, for respondent. Before WATERMAN, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations

  8. Federation of Un. Representatives v. N.L.R.B

    339 F.2d 126 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 407, 408, Dockets 28558, 28598. Argued June 10, 1964. Decided November 20, 1964. Sanford M. Katz, New York City, for Federation of Union Representatives. Emil Schlesinger, New York City (Julius Topol, New York City, on the brief), for International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union. Robert G. Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for National

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Lipman Brothers, Inc.

    355 F.2d 15 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 8 times

    No. 6526. Heard December 6, 1965. Decided January 21, 1966. Anthony J. Obadal, Atty., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Murray Brown, Boston, Mass., with whom William F. Joy and Morgan, Brown, Kearns Joy, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondents. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, and McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges.

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease