§

The Shell Co., Ltd.

172 N.L.R.B. 1227 (N.L.R.B. 1968)
The Shell Co., Ltd.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Ambox, Incorporated

    357 F.2d 138 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 20 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Ambox, Inc., 357 F.2d 138 (5 Cir. 1966), both the attorney for the employer and the president of the Company were guilty of coercive measures in their attempts to obtain copies of statements made to Board investigators.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Dan Howard Mfg. Co.

    390 F.2d 304 (7th Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times
    In Dan Howard, supra, 390 F.2d at page 309, we further stated: "The court [Sixth Circuit] pointed out that it is relevant to consider the subjective intention of the signer and his expressed state of mind in deciding whether a misapprehension was knowingly induced."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. West Point Mfg. Co.

    245 F.2d 783 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. West Point Mfg. Co., 245 F.2d 783 (5th Cir. 1957), and N.L.R.B. v. Williams, 195 F.2d 669 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 834, 73 S.Ct. 42, 97 L.Ed. 649 (1952), it was held that coercive interrogation of employees by Company officials constitutes a violation of the Act.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Beaver Meadow Creamery

    215 F.2d 247 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 15 times

    No. 11236. Argued May 17, 1954. Decided August 16, 1954. Melvin Spaeth, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Frank G. Smith, Clearfield, Pa. (Frank A. Whitsett, Clearfield, Pa., Smith, Maine, Whitsett Lee, Clearfield, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. STALEY,

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Popeil Bros

    216 F.2d 66 (7th Cir. 1954)   Cited 3 times

    No. 11102. October 1, 1954. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Ackerberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Chicago, Ill., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Ruth V. Reel, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George B. Christensen, Fred H. Daugherty, Chicago, Ill., Winston, Strawn, Black Towner, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for respondent. Before MAJOR, LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges. MAJOR, Circuit Judge. This case is here upon