The Seng Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  2. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Sinclair Company

    397 F.2d 157 (1st Cir. 1968)   Cited 28 times
    In NLRB v. Sinclair Co., 397 F.2d 157, 161 (1st Cir. 1968), one of the three consolidated cases disposed of in the Gissel opinion, the Court of Appeals said, "Whether an employer has used language that is coercive in its effect is a question essentially for the specialized experience of the Board."
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Company

    398 F.2d 336 (4th Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Company, Inc., 398 F.2d 336 (C.A.4), the court held that authorization cards are such unreliable indicators of the desires of the employees that an employer confronted with a demand for recognition based solely upon them is justified in withholding recognition pending the result of a certification election.
  6. General Steel Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    445 F.2d 1350 (4th Cir. 1971)   Cited 11 times

    No. 14316. Argued November 10, 1970. Decided July 14, 1971. Lewis P. Hamlin, Jr., Salisbury, N.C. (Kluttz Hamlin, Salisbury, N.C., on brief), for petitioners. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for respondent. Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, WINTER, Circuit Judge, and THOMSEN, District Judge. THOMSEN, District Judge. Petitioners, found

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Heck's Inc.

    398 F.2d 337 (4th Cir. 1968)   Cited 13 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Heck's Inc., 398 F.2d 337 (4th Cir. 1968), the court declined enforcement of an order to bargain, but that decision was reversed by the Supreme Court sub nom. N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575, 89 S.Ct. 1918, 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969).
  8. General Steel Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    398 F.2d 339 (4th Cir. 1968)   Cited 11 times

    No. 10543. Argued January 11, 1968. Decided June 28, 1968. Lewis P. Hamlin, Jr., Salisbury, N.C., (Robert M. Martin, High Point, N.C., on brief), for petitioners. Elliott C. Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Elliott C. Lightman, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for respondent. Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Petitioners, General Steel Products