The Scotch Whisky Association Ltd. v. ASW Distillery, LLC

4 Cited authorities

  1. In re Spirits Intern., N.V

    563 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that “[t]he Lanham Act was designed to codify, not change, the common law in this area”
  2. In re Miracle Tuesday, Llc.

    695 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2012)   Cited 2 times
    Describing analogous factors for primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks
  3. Scotch Whisky Ass'n v. U.S. Distilled Prod

    952 F.2d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 1991)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 91-1268. Cancellation No. 17,568. December 18, 1991. Charles R. Mandly, Jr., Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard Geraldson, of Chicago, Ill., argued for petitioner-appellant. With him on the brief were Beverly W. Pattishall and M. Blair Tenney. Lewis R. Shafer, Buchman O'Brien, of New York City, submitted for respondent-appellee. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before RICH, ARCHER and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges. RICH, Circuit Judge

  4. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 367,795 times   969 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss