Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Catholic Bishop

Holding that church-operated schools are not subject to NLRB jurisdiction

Labor Board v. Katz

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

Am. Home Assur. Co. v. Comm. Union Assur. Co.

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

Pattern Makers' League v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Upholding the NLRB's interpretation of the Act

Hedstrom Co. v. N.L.R.B

Affirming the Board's finding that a supervisor's statement was coercive, despite employee testimony suggesting otherwise, because the record supported both interpretations

Section 401 - Congressional declaration of findings, purposes, and policy

Finding that the LMRDA was essential to "afford necessary protection of the rights and interests of employees and the public generally as they relate to the activities of labor organizations . . ."