The Powers Regulator Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. S. Bleachery

    257 F.2d 235 (4th Cir. 1958)   Cited 33 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the essential inquiry is whether the employer shares the power of management
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times

    No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Gale Prod., Div., Outboard Marine

    337 F.2d 390 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 8 times
    In NLRB v. Gale Prods., 337 F.2d 390 (7th Cir. 1964), denying enforcement of 142 N.L.R.B. 1246, by a divided court, the Seventh Circuit declined enforcement.
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Mt. Clemens Metal Products Company

    287 F.2d 790 (6th Cir. 1961)   Cited 10 times

    No. 14263. March 21, 1961. Richard H. Frank, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harold B. Desenberg, Detroit, Mich. (Moll, Desenberg, Purdy Glover, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for respondent. Before MILLER, Chief Judge, WEICK, Circuit Judge, and THORNTON, District Judge. SHACKELFORD MILLER, JR., Chief Judge

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Filtron Company

    309 F.2d 184 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 4 times

    No. 36, Docket 27395. Submitted October 16, 1962. Decided November 1, 1962. Melvin Pollack, atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asso. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Melvin J. Welles, Stuart Broad, attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Ernest H. Falk, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent Filtron Company, Inc. John I. Coster, New York City, for respondent Filter Workers