§

The Post Publishing Co.

136 N.L.R.B. 272 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
The Post Publishing Co.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Chicago Rawhide Mfg. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    221 F.2d 165 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 31 times
    In Chicago Rawhide, this Court concluded that: "[n]either mere cooperation, preference, nor possibility of control constitute unfair labor practices; and the Board may not infer conduct that is violative of the Act from conduct that is not, unless there is a substantial basis, in fact or reason, for that inference."

  2. Hotpoint Co. v. N.L.R.B

    289 F.2d 683 (7th Cir. 1961)   Cited 7 times

    No. 13151. May 5, 1961. Theophil C. Kammholz, Chicago, Ill., Norbert E. Anderson, Chicago, Ill., Vincent A. Johnson, Chicago, Ill., Vedder, Price, Kaufman Kammholz, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Abraham A. Dash, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Constr. Specialties

    208 F.2d 170 (10th Cir. 1953)   Cited 3 times

    No. 4680. November 4, 1953. Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Washington, D.C., and Elizabeth B. Head, Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for petitioner. Philip Hornbein, Jr., Denver, Colo. (Philip Hornbein, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Circuit Judge. This case is here upon petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order issued