§

The Philip Carey Manufacturing Co.

140 N.L.R.B. 1103 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
The Philip Carey Manufacturing Co.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  2. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Herman Sausage Co

    275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 79 times
    In NLRB v. Herman Sausage Co., 275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960), our circuit held that "generally speaking, the freedom to grant a unilateral wage increase "is limited to cases where there has been a bona fide but unsuccessful attempt to reach an agreement with the union, or where the union bears the guilt for having broken off relations.' NLRB v. Andrew Jergens Co., 9 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 130, 136, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 827, 70 S.Ct. 76, 94 L.Ed. 503.

  5. Local 833, Uaw-Afl-Cio, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    300 F.2d 699 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 40 times

    Nos. 15961, 16031, 16182. Argued September 11, 1961. Decided January 26, 1962. Certiorari Denied June 4, 1962. See 82 S.Ct. 1258. Mr. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., Washington, D.C., and Mr. Louis H. Pollak, New Haven, Conn., of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Connecticut, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. John Silard, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for Local 833, UAW-AFL-CIO, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, petitioner

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Montgomery Ward

    133 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1943)   Cited 41 times

    No. 10108. February 15, 1943. Upon petition for enforcement and upon petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its cease and desist order against Montgomery Ward Co., consolidated with a petition by Montgomery Ward Co. for review and to set aside such order of the National Labor Relations Board. Order of the Board enforced. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, Gerhard P. Van

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Federal Dairy Company

    297 F.2d 487 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 14 times

    No. 5844. January 15, 1962. Samuel M. Singer, Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asst. General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Jules H. Gordon, Attorney, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. John P. Cooney, Jr., Providence, R.I., with whom Allan Seserman, New York City, was on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. ALDRICH, Circuit Judge. This is a

  8. Singer Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    119 F.2d 131 (7th Cir. 1941)   Cited 37 times
    In Singer Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 119 F.2d 131, 134, the court said: "* * * The greatest of rascals may solemnly affirm his honesty of purpose; that does not foreclose a jury from finding from the evidence submitted that he possesses no trace of such innocent quality.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Furn. Co.

    212 F.2d 431 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 15 times
    In NLRB v. International Furniture Co., 212 F.2d 431 (5 Cir. 1954), the employer repeatedly withdrew its own proposals and its agreement to some demands made by the union, failed to appear on an agreed meeting date, and instituted, shortly after the expiration of the certification year and without notice, a system of paid holidays and wage increases, and its attorney stated "the union would be five years getting a contract".

  10. Division 1142, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    294 F.2d 264 (D.C. Cir. 1961)   Cited 4 times

    No. 16007. Argued May 15, 1961. Decided July 6, 1961. Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied En Banc September 12, 1961. Mr. George Schatzki, Dallas, Tex., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Texas, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, and Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Mr. Bernard Cushman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mrs. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel