§

The Newspaper Guild

222 N.L.R.B. 760 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
The Newspaper Guild

6 Cited authorities

  1. Florida Power Light v. Electrical Workers

    417 U.S. 790 (1974)   Cited 96 times
    In Florida Power Light Co. v. IBEW, Local 641, 417 U.S. 790, 804-05, 94 S.Ct. 2737, 2744-45, 41 L.Ed.2d 477 (1974), the Supreme Court held that no § 8(b)(1)(B) violation occurs unless the disciplined conduct adversely affects the performance of his or her § 8(b)(1)(B) duties.

  2. Newspaper Guild, Erie News. Guild v. N.L.R.B

    489 F.2d 416 (3d Cir. 1973)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 72-1521, 72-1633. Argued March 8, 1973. Decided November 30, 1973. John M. McLaughlin, William C. Sennett, Knox, Graham, Pearson, McLaughlin Sennett, Erie, Pa., for petitioner in No. 72-1521. Richard H. Zamboldi, Elderkin, Martin Kelly, Erie, Pa., for petitioner in No. 73-1633. Elliot Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Joseph E. Mayer, William H. DuRoss, III, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington

  3. Danning v. Daylin, Inc.

    488 F.2d 185 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 9 times

    No. 71-2782. November 1, 1973. Rehearing Denied December 7, 1973. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Stephen P. Feldman (argued), Jeffrey Chanin of Quittner, Stutman, Treiste Glatt, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Leon Savitch (argued), of Buchalter, Nemer, Fields Savitch, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee. Before HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and RENFREW, District Judge. Of the Northern District of California. OPINION

  4. NLRB v. San Francisco Typographical U. No. 21

    486 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 4 times
    In San Francisco, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the union violated § 8(b)(1)(B) when it disciplined a foreman who discharged an employee prior to a strike and reversed the Board's finding that disciplining three strikebreakers who were also supervisors was an unfair labor practice.

  5. C.I.R. v. Zongker

    334 F.2d 44 (10th Cir. 1964)   Cited 4 times

    No. 7553. July 11, 1964. Robert A. Bernstein, Washington, D.C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, and Harry Baum, Attys., for Dept. of Justice, with him on brief), for petitioner. Wayne Coulson, Wichita, Kan. (Paul R. Kitch, Dale M. Stucky, Donald R. Newkirk, Robert J. Hill, Gerrit H. Wormhoudt, Philip Kassebaum, John E. Rees, Robert T. Cornwell, and Willard B. Thompson, Wichita, Kan., with him on brief), for respondents. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit

  6. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"