No. 489. February 13, 1950. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Facts and opinion, 175 F.2d 486, 12 Alaska 423; 176 F.2d 813, 12 Alaska 473; D.C., 66 F. Supp. 897, 11 Alaska 184; D.C., 74 F. Supp. 917, 11 Alaska 429. PER CURIAM: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The Court is of the opinion that a new trial should be granted. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to other questions presented, the judgments of the Court
No. 102, Docket 21365. Argued January 4, 1950. Decided February 24, 1950. S.A. Syme, White Plains, N.Y., L. Sherman, P.R. Collins, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. A.N. Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Robert N. Denham, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Albert M. Dreyer, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., James V. Altieri, New York City, for respondent. Louis Sherman, Washington, D.C., for Brotherhood of Elect
No. 10943. April 4, 1950. Albert M. Dreyer, Washington, D.C. (Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, and Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Charles H. Tuttle, New York City (Francis X. Ward, Indianapolis, Ind., and Daniel F. O'Connell, New York City, on brief), also on docket, Herbert G.B. King, Chattanooga, Tenn., for respondents. Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. MARTIN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board
No. 3528. August 20, 1940. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding on motion by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against Waumbec Mills, Inc., under the National Labor Relations Act § 10(e), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e). Order modified, and motion for enforcement of order granted. Thomas E. Harris, Department of Justice, of Washington, D.C. (Charles Fahy, Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp, Mortimer B. Wolf, and Alvin Rockwell, all
36738 June 14, 1934 Present, Campbell, C.J., and Holt, Epes, Hudgins, Gregory and Chinn, JJ. 1. ACTIONS — Joint Action against Two Defendants — Recovery against Only One of the Defendants — Case at Bar. — The instant case was an action brought by plaintiff against the International Brotherhood of Boiler-Makers, etc., an unincorporated association or order, and the American National Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, as joint defendants. The court instructed the jury that there could be no