The M. W. Kellogg Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
  2. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"
  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.
  4. United States Smelting, Refining Mining v. Lowe

    338 U.S. 954 (1950)   Cited 51 times

    No. 489. February 13, 1950. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Facts and opinion, 175 F.2d 486, 12 Alaska 423; 176 F.2d 813, 12 Alaska 473; D.C., 66 F. Supp. 897, 11 Alaska 184; D.C., 74 F. Supp. 917, 11 Alaska 429. PER CURIAM: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The Court is of the opinion that a new trial should be granted. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to other questions presented, the judgments of the Court

  5. International Bhd. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    181 F.2d 34 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 89 times

    No. 102, Docket 21365. Argued January 4, 1950. Decided February 24, 1950. S.A. Syme, White Plains, N.Y., L. Sherman, P.R. Collins, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. A.N. Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Robert N. Denham, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Albert M. Dreyer, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., James V. Altieri, New York City, for respondent. Louis Sherman, Washington, D.C., for Brotherhood of Elect

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. National Maritime Union of America

    175 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1949)   Cited 40 times
    Bargaining for discriminatory hiring hall clause
  7. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. L. 74, ETC

    181 F.2d 126 (6th Cir. 1950)   Cited 14 times

    No. 10943. April 4, 1950. Albert M. Dreyer, Washington, D.C. (Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, and Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Charles H. Tuttle, New York City (Francis X. Ward, Indianapolis, Ind., and Daniel F. O'Connell, New York City, on brief), also on docket, Herbert G.B. King, Chattanooga, Tenn., for respondents. Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. MARTIN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board

  8. Interborough Rapid Transit Co. v. Lavin

    159 N.E. 863 (N.Y. 1928)   Cited 30 times
    In Interborough Rapid Transit Co. v. Lavin (247 N.Y. 65, 79) the court, per LEHMAN, J., said: "This court has not yet been called upon to decide whether employees may lawfully be urged to make a choice in breach of a definite contract.
  9. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Waumbec Mills

    114 F.2d 226 (1st Cir. 1940)   Cited 10 times

    No. 3528. August 20, 1940. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding on motion by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against Waumbec Mills, Inc., under the National Labor Relations Act § 10(e), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e). Order modified, and motion for enforcement of order granted. Thomas E. Harris, Department of Justice, of Washington, D.C. (Charles Fahy, Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp, Mortimer B. Wolf, and Alvin Rockwell, all

  10. International Brotherhood, Etc. v. Wood

    162 Va. 517 (Va. 1934)   Cited 13 times

    36738 June 14, 1934 Present, Campbell, C.J., and Holt, Epes, Hudgins, Gregory and Chinn, JJ. 1. ACTIONS — Joint Action against Two Defendants — Recovery against Only One of the Defendants — Case at Bar. — The instant case was an action brought by plaintiff against the International Brotherhood of Boiler-Makers, etc., an unincorporated association or order, and the American National Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, as joint defendants. The court instructed the jury that there could be no