§

The Lynn Pacific Corp.

187 N.L.R.B. 589 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
The Lynn Pacific Corp.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  3. National Labor Rel. Board v. Gaynor News Co.

    197 F.2d 719 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 45 times
    In Gaynor it was conceded that the sole criterion for extra payments was union membership, and the vacation payments were admittedly gratuitous.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kobritz

    193 F.2d 8 (1st Cir. 1951)   Cited 43 times
    Upholding an NLRB departure from a policy of declining to assert jurisdiction, on the ground that "the Board had jurisdiction all the time"

  5. Kansas Milling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    185 F.2d 413 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 36 times

    No. 4036. November 9, 1950. Rehearing Denied December 11, 1950. George Siefkin, Wichita, Kan. (Carl T. Smith, Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for petitioner. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Washington D.C., and Leonard S. Kimmell, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the petition of the Kansas Milling

  6. Cusano v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    190 F.2d 898 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 35 times

    No. 10404. Argued May 22, 1951. Filed August 16, 1951. Samuel J. Davidson, Hoboken, N.J. (DeFazio, Davidson DeFazio, Hoboken, N.J., on the brief), for petitioners. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mark C. Curran, Washington, D.C., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. This case is

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kingston Cake Co.

    191 F.2d 563 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 21 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Kingston Cake Co., 3 Cir., 191 F.2d 563, 567, the court said: "The purpose of the charge is to give the Board a preliminary basis for determining whether to proceed in the investigation of the case.

  8. Exber, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    390 F.2d 127 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 3 times

    No. 21362. March 5, 1968. Fredrick N. Richman (argued), Sidney R. Korshak, David H. Mendelsohn, Chicago, Ill., for appellant. Harvey Letter (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Wayne S. Bishop, Joseph C. Thackery, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge. JAMESON, District Judge: This

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Raymond Pearson

    243 F.2d 456 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 9 times

    No. 16162. April 2, 1957. Morris A. Solomon, Trial Atty. NLRB, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington. D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Frederick U. Reel, for National Labor Relations Board. Leroy Jeffers, Houston, Tex., Vinson, Elkins, Weems, Searls, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for respondent. Before RIVES, TUTTLE and BROWN, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions this Court for enforcement of its decision