§

The Little Rock Downtowner, Inc.

168 N.L.R.B. 107 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
The Little Rock Downtowner, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co.

    359 F.2d 799 (7th Cir. 1966)   Cited 12 times
    In NLRB v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co., 359 F.2d 799, 800 (7th Cir. 1966), the evidence showed a narrow margin of victory by the union in an election two years earlier and high employee turnover.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Little Rock Downtowner, Inc.

    341 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 17581, 17615. March 5, 1965. Peter M. Giesey, Atty., N.L.R.B. made argument for petitioner and filed brief with Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Lee M. Modjeska, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. William E. Fortas and Earl W. DeHart, of Fowler, Fortas DeHart, Newell N. Fowler, Memphis, Tenn., made argument for respondent and filed brief. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT and MEHAFFY, Circuit