§

The Little Rock Downtowner, Inc.

148 N.L.R.B. 717 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
The Little Rock Downtowner, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  2. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Globe Products Corporation

    322 F.2d 694 (4th Cir. 1963)   Cited 16 times

    No. 8921. Argued June 6, 1963. Decided September 16, 1963. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, on brief), for petitioner. Jacob Blum, Baltimore, Md. (Charles Yumkas, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and BRYAN and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judges. SOBELOFF, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e), seeks enforcement

  4. Revere Copper and Brass, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    324 F.2d 132 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 15 times

    No. 13961. October 31, 1963. Henry E. Seyfarth, Walter P. Loomis, Jr., Richard L. Marcus, Chicago, Ill., Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather Geraldson, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner. George Christensen, Washington, D.C., amicus curiae. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Solomon I. Hirsh, Gary Green, Attys., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before SCHNACKENBERG, KNOCH and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges. KNOCH, Circuit Judge. This

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Biles Coleman L. Co.

    98 F.2d 18 (9th Cir. 1938)   Cited 19 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Biles Coleman Lumber Co., 9 Cir., 98 F.2d 18, 20, it was said: "So far as concerns the enforcement of the Board's order this is a nisi prius tribunal, and the resistive respondent by its answer, rather than by brief, should raise the issue as to any allegation of the petition which is contested."

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys