The Kroger Co.

11 Cited authorities

Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board
350 U.S. 270 (1956) Cited 403 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"
Labor Board v. Lion Oil Co.
352 U.S. 282 (1957) Cited 139 times
Observing that the court bears "a judicial responsibility to find that interpretation which can most fairly be said to be embedded in the statute, in the sense of being most harmonious with its scheme and with the general purposes that Congress manifested"
Labor Board v. Sands Mfg. Co.
306 U.S. 332 (1939) Cited 139 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.
Int'l Shoe Mach. Corp. v. United Shoe Mach. Corp.
375 U.S. 820 (1963) Cited 42 times
Holding that the theft from "wooden pallets" rather than from wharf was within the statutory compass and any other interpretation would frustrate the intention of Congress
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Deena Artware
198 F.2d 645 (6th Cir. 1952) Cited 43 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc., 198 F.2d 645, this Court granted an order of enforcement similar to one in the case now before us. The Board's Supplemental Decision and Order for the payment of back wages was enforced in that case by this Court in National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Incorporated, reported at 228 F.2d 871.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Draper Corp.
145 F.2d 199 (4th Cir. 1944) Cited 48 times
No. 5239. October 6, 1944. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board which directed the Draper Corporation to cease and desist from unfair labor practices. Petition denied. Guy Farmer, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D.C. (Alvin J. Rockwell, General Counsel, Malcolm F. Halliday, Associate General Counsel, Joseph B. Robison, and Dominick
N.L.R.B. v. R.C. Can Company
328 F.2d 974 (5th Cir. 1964) Cited 17 times
In R.C. Can, a small group of unionized employees engaged in an unauthorized "quickie strike" to pressure their employer into expediting ongoing negotiations with the union.
Pullman v. Order of Ry. Conductors Brakemen
316 F.2d 556 (7th Cir. 1963) Cited 10 times
No. 13844. April 10, 1963. Rehearing Denied En Banc May 20, 1963. Burke Williamson, Chicago, Ill., Harry Wilmarth, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Jack A. Williamson, Chicago, Ill., Shuttleworth Ingersoll, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for defendants-appellants. Howard P. Robinson, Herbert S. Anderson, Chicago, Ill., Sidley, Austin, Burgess Smith, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. Robert Diller, Martin M. Lucente, Wm. M. McGovern, Jr., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellee. Before SCHNACKENBERG, CASTLE and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges
Western Contracting Corporation v. N.L.R.B
322 F.2d 893 (10th Cir. 1963) Cited 9 times
No. 7208. September 25, 1963. Keith E. Taylor, Salt Lake City, Utah (C.C. Parsons, Calvin A. Behle, Elliott W. Evans and George W. Latimer, Salt Lake City, Utah, with him on the brief), for petitioner. Ira M. Lechner, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C., with him on the brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, LEWIS, Circuit Judge, and DOYLE, District Judge. DOYLE, District Judge. Pursuant to Section 10(e)
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kaiser Aluminum
217 F.2d 366 (9th Cir. 1954) Cited 10 times
No. 14019. June 28, 1954. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, William J. Avrutis, Attys., N.L.R.B., Bernard Dunau, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gordon Johnson, San Francisco, Cal., Walter R. Farrell, Morris L. Myers, Oakland, Cal., for respondent. Before HEALY, ORR and FEE, Circuit Judges. JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge. In 1950, pursuant to government demand, respondent

The Kroger Co.

11 Cited authorities

Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

Observing that the court bears "a judicial responsibility to find that interpretation which can most fairly be said to be embedded in the statute, in the sense of being most harmonious with its scheme and with the general purposes that Congress manifested"

In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.

Holding that the theft from "wooden pallets" rather than from wharf was within the statutory compass and any other interpretation would frustrate the intention of Congress

In R.C. Can, a small group of unionized employees engaged in an unauthorized "quickie strike" to pressure their employer into expediting ongoing negotiations with the union.