§

The Juvenile Manufacturing Co., Inc.

117 N.L.R.B. 1513 (N.L.R.B. 1957)
The Juvenile Manufacturing Co., Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Southern Bell Co.

    319 U.S. 50 (1943)   Cited 42 times
    In Seber, the United States Supreme Court addressed a similar statute which provided that certain Indian lands would be immune from state taxes if two requirements were met: that the title to the lands be held by an Indian subject to restrictions against alienation or encumbrance or approval of the Secretary of the Interior; and the lands were purchased out of trust or restricted funds.

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Howell Chevrolet Co.

    204 F.2d 79 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 53 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 86 (9th Cir. 1953), we recognized that "carriage, behavior, bearing, manner and appearance of a witness, — his demeanor, —" may cause the trier of fact to reject uncontradicted testimony.

  3. Chicago Rawhide Mfg. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    221 F.2d 165 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 31 times
    In Chicago Rawhide, this Court concluded that: "[n]either mere cooperation, preference, nor possibility of control constitute unfair labor practices; and the Board may not infer conduct that is violative of the Act from conduct that is not, unless there is a substantial basis, in fact or reason, for that inference."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Cleveland Trust Co.

    214 F.2d 95 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 21 times

    No. 11966. May 27, 1954. Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., on brief for petitioner. Welles K. Stanley, Carl H. Clark, Stanley, Smoyer Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, Hawley E. Stark, Douglas, Stark, Jett Biechele, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. ALLEN, Circuit Judge. This petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations

  5. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    112 F.2d 657 (2d Cir. 1940)   Cited 34 times
    In Westinghouse Electric Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 657, 660, a disestablishment order was sustained in a much weaker case than the present.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Underwood Mach. Co.

    179 F.2d 118 (1st Cir. 1950)   Cited 11 times
    In NLRB v. Underwood Machinery Co., 179 F.2d 118, 121 (1st Cir. 1949), this court found the reasoning of Judge (later Justice) Minton's Marshall Field dissent "persuasive."

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Houston

    193 F.2d 394 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 9 times

    No. 13457. December 28, 1951. Rehearing Denied January 12, 1952. Joseph A. Jenkins, Atty. NLRB, Fort Worth, Tex., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Sam R. Sayers, Fort Worth, Tex., Carl L. Phinney, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and STRUM, Circuit Judges. JOSEPH C. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.Page 396 Upon findings that, in violation of Secs. 8(a) (1, 3, 5) of the National Labor

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Roberts Bros

    225 F.2d 58 (9th Cir. 1955)   Cited 6 times

    No. 14115. June 30, 1955. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come, Peter Bauer, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rosenberg, Swire Coan; Abe Eugene Rosenberg, Philip A. Levin, Portland, Or., for respondent. Before STEPHENS, POPE, and FEE, Circuit Judges. STEPHENS, Circuit Judge. Respondent Roberts Brothers is an Oregon corporation which owns and operates a chain of department stores

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. West Ohio Gas Co.

    172 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1949)   Cited 11 times

    No. 10766. February 21, 1949. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board, petitioner, for enforcement of its order finding that the West Ohio Gas Company, respondent, had coerced its employees in exercise of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act, that it had discriminated by discharging certain employee for union activities, that it had raised wages to forestall union organization, and had threatened economic reprisal against employees active in union. Petition for enforcement denied

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Grand Cen. Aircraft

    216 F.2d 572 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 1 times

    No. 14010. October 22, 1954. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Edward D. Wilson, Frederick U. Reel, Franklin C. Milliken, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioners. Latham Watkins, Richard W. Lund, Richard F. Alden, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before STEPHENS and FEE, Circuit Judges, and LING, District Judge. PER CURIAM. We are asked by the National Labor Relations Board to order enforced, the