§

The Johnson & Hardin Co.

217 N.L.R.B. 993 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
The Johnson & Hardin Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.

    300 F.2d 273 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 47 times
    In NLRB v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., 300 F.2d 273 (5th Cir. 1962), the court had applied the Universal Camera test, Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951), to findings of fact made by the Board in evaluating election propaganda, a substantive determination by the Board, but the Court noted that cases cited by the Board seeking to limit review to whether the Board acted arbitrarily or capriciously "in fact support the view we [have taken]."

  2. Cross Baking Co., v. N.L.R.B

    453 F.2d 1346 (1st Cir. 1971)   Cited 25 times
    In Cross Baking, however, the statement also contained a substantial misstatement of the actual value of the benefits to be received.

  3. Collins Aikman Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    383 F.2d 722 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 22 times
    Paying employee $7 to be observer at election is an "unreasonable or excessive economic inducement" potentially influencing other employees and is ground to set aside election

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Millard Metal Service Center, Inc.

    472 F.2d 647 (1st Cir. 1973)   Cited 8 times

    No. 72-1255. Heard December 5, 1972. Decided January 22, 1973. Howard Jay Kaufman, Atty., New York City, with whom Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Abigail Cooley Baskir, Washington, D.C., and David Miller, Attys., were on brief, for petitioner. Henry G. Stewart, Boston, Mass., with whom William T. Sherry, Jr., and Nutter, McClennen Fish, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, ALDRICH

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Winchell Processing Corporation

    451 F.2d 306 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 9 times

    No. 71-1206. November 18, 1971. Michael S. Winer, of NLRB (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Edwin H. Franzen (argued), of Hill, Farrer Burrill, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents. Before BARNES, DUNIWAY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: The Labor Board petitions for enforcement of its bargaining order against respondent, Winchell Processing Corporation

  6. Thiem Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    489 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 2 times

    No. 72-2881. December 18, 1973. William F. Spalding (argued), of Gibson, Dunn Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D. C., Michael Wolly (argued), Washington, D.C., Abraham Siegel, Director, Region 31, NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CHAMBERS and BARNES, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge. The Honorable Samuel P. King, United States District Judge