§
The Item Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Trade Comm'n v. Cement Institute

    333 U.S. 683 (1948)   Cited 617 times
    Holding that commission members' prior investigation and statements to Congress about policy issues did not "necessarily mean that the minds of members were irrevocably closed on the subject" raised in later proceeding

  2. United States Smelting, Refining Mining v. Lowe

    338 U.S. 954 (1950)   Cited 51 times

    No. 489. February 13, 1950. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Facts and opinion, 175 F.2d 486, 12 Alaska 423; 176 F.2d 813, 12 Alaska 473; D.C., 66 F. Supp. 897, 11 Alaska 184; D.C., 74 F. Supp. 917, 11 Alaska 429. PER CURIAM: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The Court is of the opinion that a new trial should be granted. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to other questions presented, the judgments of the Court

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Textile Mach. Works

    214 F.2d 929 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 35 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Textile Machine Works, Inc., 1954, 214 F.2d 929 this court held that a complaint against Textile, alleging violations by it of Section 8(a)(1), (3), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a)(1), (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, was barred by the time limitation imposed by Section 10(b), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(b), where workers had requested reinstatement rather than employment as new employees.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. National Maritime Union of America

    175 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1949)   Cited 40 times
    Bargaining for discriminatory hiring hall clause

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Philadelphia Iron Works, Inc.

    211 F.2d 937 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 25 times
    Noting that hiring practices after a grievance was filed "would be a factor for the board's consideration" but that the NLRB easily could reason that subsequent hiring practices were reactionary to the grievance and did not accurately reflect the prior hiring arrangement

  6. Katz v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    196 F.2d 411 (9th Cir. 1952)   Cited 26 times
    Continuing unfair labor practice

  7. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. L. 404, ETC

    205 F.2d 99 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 16 times

    No. 4719. June 10, 1953. Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and James A. Ryan, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Raymond T. King, Springfield, Mass. (Ely, King, Kingsbury Lyman, Springfield, Mass., on brief), for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. MAGRUDER, Chief Judge. Brown Equipment Manufacturing Co., Inc. — hereinafter called

  8. Alexander v. United States

    210 F.2d 727 (D.C. Cir. 1954)   Cited 1 times

    No. 11895. Argued December 22, 1953. Decided January 7, 1954. Mr. Andrew W. Carroll, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., and Lewis A. Carroll and William B. Bryant, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. William J. Peck, Asst. U.S. Atty. at the time the record was filed, also entered an appearance for appellee. Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER and FAHY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The appeal is from