§

The Idaho Statesman

281 N.L.R.B. 272 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
The Idaho Statesman

8 Cited authorities

  1. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 631 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  2. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  3. Newspaper Printing Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    625 F.2d 956 (10th Cir. 1980)   Cited 24 times
    Stating that "it is the Board's duty to make the final determination as to whether an unfair labor practice has occurred" and that "insistence to impasse upon a non-mandatory subject of bargaining violates § 8"

  4. Newspaper Printing Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    692 F.2d 615 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 15 times
    In Newspaper Printing, the employer did not merely reserve the right to assign work to another union, but also reserved the right unilaterally to determine what jobs were in the bargaining unit.

  5. Newport News Shipbuilding v. N.L.R.B

    602 F.2d 73 (4th Cir. 1979)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that employer's proposal to change bargaining unit definition from "designers" to "draftsmen" would not merely affect work assignments but would alter the scope of the bargaining unit, because it would "not only modify the job functions of the various unit members but also affect their right to representation"

  6. Newspaper Production Company v. N.L.R.B

    503 F.2d 821 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 16 times
    Allowing employees to bargain to impasse on restriction of bargaining unit where issue was whether there should be one union or two

  7. University of Chicago v. N.L.R.B

    514 F.2d 942 (7th Cir. 1975)   Cited 15 times
    In Univ. of Chicago v. N.L.R.B., 514 F.2d 942 (7th Cir. 1975), the University had transferred custodial work from one bargaining unit to another after bargaining to impasse over the transfer.

  8. Boeing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    581 F.2d 793 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that a recognition clause defines which particular people are subject to the contract