The Hearst Corp.

23 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,036 times 71 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 471 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.
94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938) Cited 179 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.
L'Eggs Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
619 F.2d 1337 (9th Cir. 1980) Cited 37 times
Finding that statement of anti-union motive eliminates question concerning validity of proffered legitimate reason for adverse action
Terrell Machine Company v. N.L.R.B
427 F.2d 1088 (4th Cir. 1970) Cited 47 times
No. 13371. Argued December 2, 1969. Decided January 20, 1970. William W. Sturges, Charlotte, N.C. (Weinstein, Waggoner, Sturges Odom, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas E. Silfen, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and HARVEY, District Judge. WINTER, Circuit Judge:
Irving Air Chute Company v. N.L.R.B
350 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1965) Cited 49 times
In Irving Air Chute Co. v. N.L.R.B., 2 Cir., 350 F.2d 176, 182, the Court in allowing enforcement of the Board's order cited many cases for the proposition, "`It is for the Board not the courts to determine how the effect of prior unfair labor practices may be expunged'."
Universal Sec. Instruments v. N.L.R.B
649 F.2d 247 (4th Cir. 1981) Cited 20 times
No. 80-1494. Argued February 4, 1981. Decided May 12, 1981. Warren M. Davison, Baltimore, Md. (Earle K. Shawe, Leslie R. Stellman, Stephen D. Shawe, Shawe Rosenthal, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for petitioner. Susan L. Williams, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief)
Hotel, Motel Restaurant Employees v. N.L.R.B
785 F.2d 796 (9th Cir. 1986) Cited 13 times
No. 85-7106. Argued and Submitted November 13, 1985. Decided March 25, 1986. David Rosenfeld, William A. Sokol. Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger Rosenfeld, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners. William Stewart, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Susan Ardissan, M. Armon Cooper, Lukens, St. Peter Cooper, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor-respondent. Burger Pits, Inc. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED, KENNEDY and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge.
Leeds Northrup Company v. N.L.R.B
391 F.2d 874 (3d Cir. 1968) Cited 32 times
In Leeds Northrup Co. v. NLRB, 391 F.2d 874 (3rd Cir. 1968), the Third Circuit enforced the Board's order requiring the company to grant backpay to union employees based on a prior compensation formula where the company had unilaterally altered the formula in violation of its duty to bargain.
N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Longshoremen's Ware. Union
283 F.2d 558 (9th Cir. 1960) Cited 41 times
Holding labor union culpable under Taft-Hartley Act for acts performed by its agents, i.e., by union stewards
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,106 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

The Hearst Corp.

23 Cited authorities

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

Finding that statement of anti-union motive eliminates question concerning validity of proffered legitimate reason for adverse action

In Irving Air Chute Co. v. N.L.R.B., 2 Cir., 350 F.2d 176, 182, the Court in allowing enforcement of the Board's order cited many cases for the proposition, "`It is for the Board not the courts to determine how the effect of prior unfair labor practices may be expunged'."

In Leeds Northrup Co. v. NLRB, 391 F.2d 874 (3rd Cir. 1968), the Third Circuit enforced the Board's order requiring the company to grant backpay to union employees based on a prior compensation formula where the company had unilaterally altered the formula in violation of its duty to bargain.

Holding labor union culpable under Taft-Hartley Act for acts performed by its agents, i.e., by union stewards

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"