§

The Hartz Mountain Corp.

228 N.L.R.B. 492 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
The Hartz Mountain Corp.

52 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Board v. Hearst Publications

    322 U.S. 111 (1944)   Cited 791 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")

  3. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  4. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  5. Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

    319 U.S. 533 (1943)   Cited 325 times
    Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

  6. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  7. Labor Board v. Gullett Gin Co.

    340 U.S. 361 (1951)   Cited 211 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding unemployment compensation payments not deductible from back pay award under the National Labor Relations Act

  8. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  9. Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    419 U.S. 301 (1974)   Cited 55 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"

  10. Charlie's Girls, Inc. v. Revlon, Inc.

    483 F.2d 953 (2d Cir. 1973)   Cited 44 times

    No. 1126, Docket 73-2022. Argued August 15, 1973. Decided August 30, 1973. Gerald W. Griffin, New York City (R. Bradlee Boal, Norman H. Zivin, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellant. Joseph D. Garon, New York City (James N. Buckner, Peter D. Murray, Frederick P. Houston, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Before MULLIGAN, OAKES and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: We hereby reverse

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,086 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"