§

The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co.

118 N.L.R.B. 1280 (N.L.R.B. 1957)
The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Jencks v. United States

    353 U.S. 657 (1957)   Cited 1,106 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendants are entitled to obtain the prior statements of persons to government agents when those persons are to testify against the defendants at trial

  2. McNabb v. United States

    318 U.S. 332 (1943)   Cited 1,572 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that confessions obtained in violation of congressional requirement to promptly present defendant to court must be excluded, even though Congress had not explicitly forbidden the admission of such confessions

  3. Touhy v. Ragen

    340 U.S. 462 (1951)   Cited 696 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a subordinate agency employee cannot be compelled to comply with a subpoena duces tecum where a valid agency regulation prohibits such compliance in the absence of agency authorization, and where no authorization has been granted

  4. Bowman Dairy Co. v. United States

    341 U.S. 214 (1951)   Cited 595 times
    Holding that Rule 17(c) subpoenas are not a substitute for discovery, as "[i]t was not intended by Rule 16 to give a limited right of discovery, and then by Rule 17 to give a right of discovery in the broadest terms"

  5. Goldman v. United States

    316 U.S. 129 (1942)   Cited 359 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding the warrantless use of a detectaphone

  6. Gordon v. United States

    344 U.S. 414 (1953)   Cited 253 times
    In Gordon v. United States, 344 U.S. 414, the petitioners had shown that written statements given to government agents by a key government witness contradicted the witness' trial testimony.

  7. Communist Party v. Control Board

    351 U.S. 115 (1956)   Cited 72 times
    In Communist Party the Court remanded the case to the Board with directions to resolve the charges of taint, and to make a fresh determination on the merits, if taint were found.

  8. Boske v. Comingore

    177 U.S. 459 (1900)   Cited 198 times
    Approving of analogous Treasury Department regulations

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Peter Cailler Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co.

    130 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1942)   Cited 69 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Peter Cailler Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co., 130 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1942), Judge Learned Hand stated his view of the type of activity protected by section 7.

  10. Agwilines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    87 F.2d 146 (5th Cir. 1936)   Cited 75 times
    In Agwilines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 87 F.2d 146, 147, and in Waterman S.S. Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 119 F.2d 760, a contempt proceeding involving the ascertainment of back payments necessary to make employees whole, we dealt with the purpose and effect of the "make whole" provisions of the statute.