§

The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co.

140 N.L.R.B. 1011 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. J.W. Rex Company

    243 F.2d 356 (3d Cir. 1957)   Cited 20 times

    No. 12019. Argued February 4, 1957. Decided April 10, 1957. William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert H. Kleeb, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board filed pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor

  2. International Un., Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    231 F.2d 237 (7th Cir. 1956)   Cited 21 times
    In UAW v. NLRB, 231 F.2d 237 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 908, 77 S.Ct. 146, 1 L.Ed.2d 117 (1956), we required that a charging party be allowed to submit evidence in a full hearing on its objections to a proposed settlement where the disagreement concerned a stipulation of facts upon which the settlement was based.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Masters-Lake Success, Inc.

    287 F.2d 35 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 12 times

    No. 199, Docket 26561. Argued January 10, 1961. Decided February 15, 1961. Allan I. Mendelsohn, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Melvin J. Welles, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Bernard H. Fitzpatrick, of Butler, Fitzpatrick DeSio, New York City, for respondent employer. Murray A. Frank, Brooklyn,

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Appleton Electric Company

    296 F.2d 202 (7th Cir. 1961)   Cited 11 times
    Disagreeing over Board's authority to disregard accretion clauses