§

The Grand Rapids Press

331 N.L.R.B. 296 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
The Grand Rapids Press

16 Cited authorities

  1. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 314 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  2. Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    441 U.S. 488 (1979)   Cited 290 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that proposal concerning in-plant cafeteria prices was within duty to bargain despite fact that prices were set by third-party supplier rather than employer

  3. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  5. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  6. San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations

  7. Providence Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    93 F.3d 1012 (1st Cir. 1996)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that where, inter alia, the employer distributed written information about a merger, including some workplace changes such as "broad hints that it already had formulated some ideas relative to future staffing of the new system" and its expected regulatory approval, "[u]nder the totality of the circumstances that existed here—especially the employer's expressed confidence that the merger would take place soon and the emphasis in its handouts on the reallocation of personnel," substantial evidence supported the Board's order requiring disclosure of merger-related documents

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Pfizer, Inc.

    763 F.2d 887 (7th Cir. 1985)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that an employer's bare assertion that information is confidential does not entitle it to resist production

  9. Timken Roller Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 56 times
    In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.

    936 F.2d 144 (3d Cir. 1991)   Cited 17 times

    Nos. 90-3857, 91-3060. Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) June 7, 1991. Decided June 25, 1991. As Amended June 28, 1991. James F. Brady, New Jersey Bell Telephone Co., Newark, N.J., for respondent. Howard E. Perlstein, Richard A. Cohen, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Ellen Dichner, Gladstein, Reif Meginniss, New York City, for intervenor. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before SLOVITER, Chief Judge, and GREENBERG and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE