§
The Gerkin Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B

    354 F.2d 432 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 54 times
    In James H. Matthews Co., supra, the employee in question signed an authorization card. Later the union received a letter, postmarked 11 days after the effective date for determining majority status of the union, requesting return of the employee's authorization card. Allegedly, the letter was neither written, dated, nor addressed by the employee and was originally left with an undisclosed person.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Dorn's Transportation Company

    405 F.2d 706 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 40 times
    Noting that "a good faith effort to conform to the requirements of the law" would be a legal motivation for withholding benefits

  5. Utrad Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    454 F.2d 520 (7th Cir. 1972)   Cited 20 times
    In Utrad, the court held that an isolated statement by a foreman made without the knowledge or acquiescence of higher management authority and threatening a plant closing upon a union victory did not violate section 8(a)(1).

  6. Bowling Green-Warren Cty. Comm. Hosp v. N.L.R.B

    756 F.2d 41 (6th Cir. 1985)

    Nos. 84-5206, 84-5321. Cause Argued January 25, 1985. Decided March 5, 1985. Herman L. Allison (argued), Constangy, Brooks Smith, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner. Elliott Moore (argued), Nancy Hunt, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L. R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRITT and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and HILLMAN, District Judge. Honorable Douglas W. Hillman, United States District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Miller

    341 F.2d 870 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 274, 306, Dockets 29186, 29296. Argued January 6, 1965. Decided March 1, 1965. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B.), for petitioner. Sanford H. Markham, New York City (Michael P. Graff, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board

  8. Murphy Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    550 F.2d 1004 (4th Cir. 1977)

    No. 76-1470. Argued November 10, 1976. Decided March 10, 1977. Edward E. McGinley, Jr., and David W. Greenfield, McKeesport, Pa., for petitioner. Edmund D. Cooke, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., (John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel and Michael S. Winer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Petition for review from National Labor Relations Board. Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and