The Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 872 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Madison Courier, Inc.

    472 F.2d 1307 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 98 times
    Holding that "[i]f the discriminatee accepts significantly lower-paying work too soon after the discrimination in question, he may be subject to a reduction in back pay on the ground that he willfully incurred a loss by accepting an `unsuitably' low paying position"
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Company

    360 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 51 times
    Permitting "non-deduction of supplemental earnings . . . where an employee who had spare-time earnings prior to discharge from his regular job continued in the same spare-time job during his period of discharge," and further holding that as long as employee was "moonlighting before his unlawful discharge," amounts earned in any "spare time employment" should not be used to reduce back-pay award
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Rice Lake Creamery Company

    365 F.2d 888 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 15 times
    Following Mastro Plastics
  6. National Labor Relations Bd. v. S. Silk Mills

    242 F.2d 697 (6th Cir. 1957)   Cited 20 times
    In NLRB v. Southern Silk Mills, Inc., 242 F.2d 697 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 821, 78 S.Ct. 28, 2 L.Ed. 2d 37 (1957), the court concluded that after a fruitless seven-month search for employment in their trade, striking textile knitters should have sought other jobs for which they were qualified.
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E. Tex. St. Castings

    255 F.2d 284 (5th Cir. 1958)   Cited 14 times

    No. 14459. May 15, 1958. Rehearing Denied June 11, 1958. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Rosanna A. Blake, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. O.B. Fisher, J.D. McLaughlin, Paris, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In May 1954, we entered a decree modifying and enforcing

  8. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Kartarik, Inc.

    227 F.2d 190 (8th Cir. 1955)   Cited 15 times

    No. 14958. November 22, 1955. Norton J. Come, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Chicago, Ill., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel and William J. Avrutis, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Harold Shear, St. Paul, Minn., for respondent. Before JOHNSEN, COLLET and VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judges. JOHNSEN, Circuit

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Ambrose Distrib

    439 F.2d 720 (9th Cir. 1971)

    No. 20200. March 23, 1971. On Application for Enforcement of a Supplemental Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Michael Barkow (argued), Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Elliott Moore Seth D. Rosen, Attys., Washington, D.C., Charles M. Henderson, Director, N.L.R.B., Seattle, Wash., for petitioner. Richard Weston (argued), of Weston Weston, Boise, Idaho, for respondent. Before JERTBERG, DUNIWAY and CARTER, Circuit Judges