§

The Express-News Corp.

223 N.L.R.B. 627 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
The Express-News Corp.

9 Cited authorities

  1. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

    376 U.S. 254 (1964)   Cited 7,008 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice

  2. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn

    420 U.S. 469 (1975)   Cited 952 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a radio station could not constitutionally be held liable for broadcasting the name of a rape victim, because the victim's name was contained in public records

  3. New York Times Co. v. United States

    403 U.S. 713 (1971)   Cited 870 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim of potential harm to national security does not provide the executive branch with unconstrained authority to override the freedom of the press

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 759 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"

  5. Time, Inc. v. Firestone

    424 U.S. 448 (1976)   Cited 498 times
    Holding ex-wife of heir to tire manufacturing fortune not public figure, even though her divorce was publicized

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  7. Leedom v. Kyne

    358 U.S. 184 (1958)   Cited 727 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal courts have jurisdiction to strike down agency orders made in excess of the agency's delegated powers

  8. Associated Press v. United States

    326 U.S. 1 (1945)   Cited 545 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Associated Press, a consortium of newspapers, must eliminate an exclusivity feature that could be traced to agreement among horizontal rivals

  9. Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Pearson

    390 F.2d 489 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 29 times
    Holding lobbying is protected by the right to petition government