§

The Evening News Association

145 N.L.R.B. 996 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
The Evening News Association

7 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union

    353 U.S. 87 (1957)   Cited 197 times
    Discussing congressional debate over the Taft-Hartley amendments of 1947

  3. Modern Manufacturing v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    344 U.S. 816 (1952)   Cited 27 times

    No. 54. Decided October 13, 1952. C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. James Barnes for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, George J. Bott, David P. Finding and Mozart G. Ratner for the National Labor Relations Board, respondent. Reported below: 193 F. 2d 613.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick

    198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3 Cir. 1952), that court sustained a Board order requiring a respondent partnership which operated several enterprises engaged in the manufacture of ladies' garments to either reopen a plant which it had closed in violation of the Act because its employees had organized or give its employees an opportunity to work in other plants operated by the partnership.

  5. Olin Industries v. National Labor Rel. Board

    191 F.2d 613 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 26 times

    No. 13275. August 7, 1951. Benjamin E. Gordon, Boston, Mass., Gordon Epstein, Maurice Epstein and Allan Seserman, all of Boston, Mass., Samuel Leiter, Chelsea, Mass., of counsel, for petitioner. George J. Bott, Frederick U. Reel, Atty. NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, and Maurice Alexandre, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before McCORD, RUSSELL, and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here upon petition

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Somerset Classics

    193 F.2d 613 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 25 times

    No. 58, Docket 22081. Argued December 11, 1951. Decided January 14, 1952. Willis S. Ryza, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Dominick L. Manoli, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Walter J. Mahoney, of Buffalo, N.Y., and George Moskowitz, of New York City, for respondent Somerset Classics, Inc. Aaron L. Danzig

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nina Dye Works Co.

    198 F.2d 362 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 3 times

    No. 10714. Argued June 16, 1952. Decided July 24, 1952. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mark C. Curran, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. John F. Reddy, Jr., New York City (Engel, Judge, Miller Sterling, Francis G. Stapleton, Joseph M. Midler, New York City, on the brief), for Nina Dye Works Co., Inc. Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges