§

The Dow Chemical Co.

212 N.L.R.B. 333 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
The Dow Chemical Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  2. Drake Bakeries v. Bakery Workers

    370 U.S. 254 (1962)   Cited 286 times
    Holding that because parties had failed to carve out the issue in question from the arbitration clause, it needed to be arbitrated

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”

  4. Packinghouse Workers v. Needham

    376 U.S. 247 (1964)   Cited 45 times
    Holding that a union does not waive its right to arbitrate grievances simply because it engages in an illegal strike

  5. Timken Roller Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 56 times
    In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.

  6. United Furniture Workers of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    336 F.2d 738 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 16 times

    No. 17961. Argued February 19, 1964. Decided April 16, 1964. Certiorari Denied October 12, 1964. See 85 S.Ct. 73. Mr. Martin Raphael, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioners. Messrs. David E. Feller and Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., also entered appearances for petitioners. Mrs. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel

  7. Confectionery and Tobacco Drivers v. N.L.R.B

    312 F.2d 108 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 17 times
    Finding condonation

  8. United Elec., R. M. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    223 F.2d 338 (D.C. Cir. 1955)   Cited 21 times
    Applying section 8(d) to factory workers engaged in an illegal strike

  9. N.L.R.B. v. State Electric Service, Inc.

    477 F.2d 749 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 2 times

    No. 72-3477. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. April 19, 1973. Rehearing Denied June 14, 1973. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Charles M. Paschal, Director, Region 15, N. L. R. B., New Orleans, La., for petitioner. Lynn C. Higby, Panama City, Fla., for respondent. Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge: The National

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kaiser Aluminum

    217 F.2d 366 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 10 times

    No. 14019. June 28, 1954. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, William J. Avrutis, Attys., N.L.R.B., Bernard Dunau, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gordon Johnson, San Francisco, Cal., Walter R. Farrell, Morris L. Myers, Oakland, Cal., for respondent. Before HEALY, ORR and FEE, Circuit Judges. JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge. In 1950, pursuant to government demand, respondent