The Dixie Terminal Co.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,675 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"
  3. Labor Board v. Fainblatt

    306 U.S. 601 (1939)   Cited 281 times
    Upholding NLRA under Commerce Power
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.
  5. U.S. v. Women's Sportswear Assn

    336 U.S. 460 (1949)   Cited 149 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In United States v. Women's Sportswear Mfrs. Ass'n, 336 U.S. 460, 464, 69 S.Ct. 714, 93 L.Ed. 805 (1949), the nexus of interstate commerce necessary to success on the merits had been found insufficient after a trial.
  6. Polish Alliance v. Labor Board

    322 U.S. 643 (1944)   Cited 138 times
    In Polish National Alliance v. NLRB, 322 U.S. 643, 64 S.Ct. 1196, 88 L.Ed. 1509 (1944), the Court held that the National Labor Relations Act applied to a fraternal organization providing death, disability and accident benefits to its members and their beneficiaries.
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors

    196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 37 times

    No. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations

  8. National Labor Rel. Board v. Tenn. Coach Co.

    191 F.2d 546 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 35 times

    No. 11238. July 9, 1951. Sidney Sherman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, and Irving M. Herman, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Charles D. Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn. (Charles D. Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn., on the brief; Anderson Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn., of counsel), for respondent. Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. This is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement

  9. Berthold-Jennings L. v. St. Louis, I.M. S

    80 F.2d 32 (8th Cir. 1935)   Cited 46 times
    Ruling there was no evidence of willful, intentional, or fraudulent destruction of records where it was normal business procedure for accumulated files to be destroyed every five years
  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Superior Co.

    199 F.2d 39 (6th Cir. 1952)   Cited 15 times

    No. 11461. September 19, 1952. Philip Fusco, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Bernard Dunau, and Alice Andrews, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Henry G. Friedlander, New York City (Henry G. Friedlander, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. MILLER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the provisions of ยง 10(e) of the National Labor Relations