The Dickinson-Iron Community Action Agency; Dickinson-Iron Alternative Fuel Energy Corp.; Eagle Fiber Fuels Manufacturing, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv
380 U.S. 255 (1965) Cited 326 times
Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act
Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.
691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982) Cited 339 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"
Labor Board v. Electrical Workers
346 U.S. 464 (1953) Cited 125 times 41 Legal Analyses
Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute
Prill v. N.L.R.B
755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985) Cited 80 times 3 Legal Analyses
In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."
George C. Foss Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
752 F.2d 1407 (9th Cir. 1985) Cited 16 times
Finding an issue fully and fairly litigated in part because there was an opportunity for cross-examination
Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. N.L.R.B
424 F.2d 1151 (7th Cir. 1970) Cited 20 times
In Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. NLRB, 424 F.2d 1151 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 831, 91 S.Ct. 63, 27 L.Ed.2d 62 (1970), the Seventh Circuit permitted the Board to use a 50% formula to determine whether certain workers could vote in a union election.
N.L.R.B. v. Tamara Foods, Inc.
692 F.2d 1171 (8th Cir. 1982) Cited 5 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding § 502 inapplicable in a case where there was no collective bargaining agreement

The Dickinson-Iron Community Action Agency; Dickinson-Iron Alternative Fuel Energy Corp.; Eagle Fiber Fuels Manufacturing, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act

Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

Holding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"

Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."

Finding an issue fully and fairly litigated in part because there was an opportunity for cross-examination

In Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. NLRB, 424 F.2d 1151 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 831, 91 S.Ct. 63, 27 L.Ed.2d 62 (1970), the Seventh Circuit permitted the Board to use a 50% formula to determine whether certain workers could vote in a union election.

Finding § 502 inapplicable in a case where there was no collective bargaining agreement