§

The Capital Times Co.

223 N.L.R.B. 651 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
The Capital Times Co.

61 Cited authorities

  1. Branzburg v. Hayes

    408 U.S. 665 (1972)   Cited 1,825 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that government need not “demonstrate some ‘compelling need’ for a newsman's testimony”

  2. N. A. A. C. P. v. Alabama

    357 U.S. 449 (1958)   Cited 1,974 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[c]ompelled disclosure of membership in an organization engaged in advocacy of particular beliefs" may violate the First Amendment

  3. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 630 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  4. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  5. Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Human Rel. Comm'n

    413 U.S. 376 (1973)   Cited 522 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ordinance making it unlawful to "aid" sexually discriminatory employment practices could be constitutionally applied to bar newspaper advertisements for sex-designated employment

  6. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  7. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo

    418 U.S. 241 (1974)   Cited 477 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional a state law that required newspapers to provide "right to reply" to any candidate who was personally or professionally assailed in order to eliminate the "abuses of bias and manipulative reportage" by the press

  8. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  9. Public Utilities Comm'n v. Pollak

    343 U.S. 451 (1952)   Cited 518 times
    Holding that the applicability of the Fifth Amendment "concededly appl[ies] to and restrict only the Federal Government and not private persons."

  10. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"