§
The Blue Note

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S.S. Co.

    337 U.S. 656 (1949)   Cited 88 times
    Holding "total rejection of an opposed view cannot of itself impugn the integrity or competence of a trier of fact"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Mastro Plastics Corporation

    354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 96 times
    In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  4. J. H. RUTTER REX MFG. CO., INC. v. N.L.R.B

    473 F.2d 223 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 43 times
    In J.H. Rutter Rex Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 473 F.2d 223 (5th Cir. 1973), a group of claimants had worked at lower paying jobs following their unlawful discharges.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Westin Hotel

    758 F.2d 1126 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that the fact that a waitress quit a comparable job did not toll her backpay liability where the sinks at the new job backed up and flooded when it rained

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Company

    360 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 51 times
    Permitting "non-deduction of supplemental earnings . . . where an employee who had spare-time earnings prior to discharge from his regular job continued in the same spare-time job during his period of discharge," and further holding that as long as employee was "moonlighting before his unlawful discharge," amounts earned in any "spare time employment" should not be used to reduce back-pay award

  7. N.L.R.B. v. S.E. Nichols of Ohio, Inc.

    704 F.2d 921 (6th Cir. 1983)   Cited 13 times

    No. 81-1756. Argued February 22, 1983. Decided April 15, 1983. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel (argued), Frances O'Connell, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Leonard W. Wagman (argued), Robert S. Goodman, Golenbock Barell, New York City, for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before KEITH, MARTIN, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of orders entered against S.E. Nichols of Ohio, Inc. on September

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.

    366 F.2d 809 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 23 times

    No. 19448. September 30, 1966. Melvin J. Welles, Paul Elkind, Robert B. Schwartz, Attys., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Hal Rachal, Midland, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and COX, District Judge. William Harold Cox, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Mississippi, sitting by designation. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: We hope that this opinion proves