§

The Bell Co., Inc.

243 N.L.R.B. 977 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
The Bell Co., Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  2. Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO

    417 U.S. 249 (1974)   Cited 366 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees

  3. Southport Pet., Co. v. N.L.R.B

    315 U.S. 100 (1942)   Cited 187 times
    Ruling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Bell Co., Inc.

    561 F.2d 1264 (7th Cir. 1977)   Cited 17 times
    In NLRB v. Bell Co., Inc., 561 F.2d 1264 (7th Cir. 1977), the court found that while there was substantial similarity between the operations of the original and subsequent employers, no evidence existed that the prior owners "controlled or benefited from the operation" of the new business.

  5. United States Pipe and Foundry Co. v. N.L.R.B

    398 F.2d 544 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 23 times

    No. 24837. July 23, 1968. John J. Coleman, Jr., A. Henry Gaede, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for petitioner; Allen Poppleton, Bradley, Arant, Rose White, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel. Benj. L. Erdreich, Birmingham, Ala., Michael Gottesman, Washington, D.C., Bernard Kleinman, Chicago, Ill., Elliot Bredhoff, George H. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Jerome Cooper, Birmingham, Ala., for intervenor. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William F. Wachter, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Neuhoff Bros. Packers, Inc.

    398 F.2d 640 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 13 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Neuhoff Bros. Packers, Inc., 398 F.2d 640, 646 (5th Cir. 1968), this court reviewed various decisions requiring the company's improper motive, to be the pure motive, the real motive, a substantial motive, the moving cause, the primary motive, and the actual motive.