§

The Bedford-Nugent Corp.

137 N.L.R.B. 1030 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
The Bedford-Nugent Corp.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. National L. Rel. B. v. Sunrise L. Trim

    241 F.2d 620 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 26 times

    No. 115, Docket 24222. Argued January 9, 1957. Decided February 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel; Samuel M. Singer, Nancy M. Sherman, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joseph T. King, Alexander Eltman, New York City, for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Whitelight Prod. Div. of White M.R

    298 F.2d 12 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 5870, 5877. January 15, 1962. Melvin J. Welles, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for National Labor Relations Board. Robert Abelow, New York City, with whom Marshall C. Berger, William J. Abelow and Weil, Gotshal Manges, New York City, were on brief, for respondent in No. 5870. Allan R. Rosenberg, Boston, Mass., for petitioner in No. 5877. Before