§

The Armstrong Rubber Co.

283 N.L.R.B. 625 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
The Armstrong Rubber Co.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Birch Run Welding Fabricating, v. N.L.R.B

    761 F.2d 1175 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 35 times
    Ordering general layoffs to discourage or retaliate against union activity is unlawful discrimination, even though some employees opposed to the union were laid-off as well

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Amber Delivery Serv., Inc.

    651 F.2d 57 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 26 times
    In Amber and Seven-Up, we found the fact of truck ownership a significant (though not in itself controlling) factor suggesting independent contractor status.

  7. Jim Causley Pontiac v. N.L.R.B

    620 F.2d 122 (6th Cir. 1980)   Cited 22 times
    Relying on Air Surrey, supra

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co.

    351 F.2d 693 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co., 8 Cir., 351 F.2d 693, also decided since this case was submitted, this court stated that if the factual conclusion of the Board is based upon substantial evidence on the whole record, this court must accept such factual determination as binding. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 354 F.2d 432, decided December 29, 1965, adheres to these principles.

  9. Hedison Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    643 F.2d 32 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 8 times

    No. 80-1421. Argued February 11, 1981. Decided March 11, 1981. David F. Sweeney, Warwick, R. I., with whom Breslin Sweeney, Warwick, R. I., was on brief, for petitioner. Corinna L. Metcalf, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Richard B. Bader and Sandra Shands Elligers, Attys., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition

  10. Squier Distributing v. Loc. 7, Int'l Broth

    801 F.2d 238 (6th Cir. 1986)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 85-5943, 85-6119. Argued July 29, 1986. Decided September 15, 1986. William P. Marks, Dresser, Marks, Svendsen, Oster, Bird, Sturgis, Mich., Craig W. Lange, Riley Roumell, Detroit, Mich., George Roumell, Jr. (argued), for petitioner, cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Robert Bell (argued), Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Linda Dreeben, Sandra Elligers, Bernard Gottfried, Director N.L. R.B., Detroit, Mich., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Petition for review from the