The Archer Laundry Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Air Ctrl. Prod. of St. Petersburg

    335 F.2d 245 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 54 times

    No. 21017. July 28, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Lawrence Gold, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Stephen B. Goldberg, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harrison C. Thompson, Jr., Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos Evans, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and BREWSTER, District Judge. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. This is another ยง 8(a)(5), 29

  3. N.L.R.B. v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc.

    297 F.2d 74 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 50 times
    In NLRB v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc., (5 Cir. 1961) 297 F.2d 74, 76, the necessity for granting a hearing on objections to an election was under consideration.
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Clearfield Cheese Company

    322 F.2d 89 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 20 times
    In NLRB v. Clearfield Cheese Co., 322 F.2d 89 (3d Cir. 1963), for example, the court enforced a bargaining order of the Labor Board based upon findings that a speech and a letter from the employer to his employees conveying a threat that the employer would go out of business if the union prevailed in the election had robbed the employees of free choice.
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Lord Baltimore Press, Inc.

    300 F.2d 671 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 18 times

    No. 8416. Argued January 5, 1962. Decided March 19, 1962. Glen M. Bendixsen, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Earle K. Shawe, Baltimore, Md. (Sidney J. Barban, William J. Rosenthal, and Larry M. Wolf, Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOPER, BRYAN and BELL

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Poinsett Lumber & Manufacturing Co.

    221 F.2d 121 (4th Cir. 1955)   Cited 21 times

    No. 6921. Argued March 14, 1955. Decided April 1, 1955. Irving M. Herman, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, New York City (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel; Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Elizabeth W. Weston, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Arthur E. Pettit, New York City, and C.F. Haynsworth, Jr., Greenville, S.C. (Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam Roberts, New York City, and Haynsworth, Perry, Bryant, Marion Johnstone