§

The American Ship Building Co.

142 N.L.R.B. 1362 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
The American Ship Building Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  2. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  3. Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union

    353 U.S. 87 (1957)   Cited 197 times
    Discussing congressional debate over the Taft-Hartley amendments of 1947

  4. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Dalton Brick Tile Corporation

    301 F.2d 886 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 18 times

    No. 18765. April 13, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Richard J. Scupi, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Erle Phillips, John Bacheller, Jr., Fisher Phillips, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and CAMERON and BROWN, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. The question presented here is whether, during the time bargaining for a collective

  6. Morand Bros. Bev. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    204 F.2d 529 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 21 times

    No. 10727. May 28, 1953. Samuel L. Golan, Chester F. McNamara and Leonard W. Golan, Chicago, Ill. (Golan Golan, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for petitioner. S.G. Lippman, Fred F. Herzog and Robert Karmel, Chicago, Ill., for amicus curiae. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard Dunau, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Mary E. Williamson, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, LINDLEY and

  7. Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    270 F.2d 40 (3d Cir. 1959)   Cited 11 times
    In Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. NLRB, 270 F.2d 40, 43 (3d Cir. 1959), the court, in sustaining the Board's finding that a shut-down by the employer was not motivated by a fear that a sudden strike would endanger plant and personnel, stated that "to apply hindsight in the light of what later occurred would not be a true assessment of the company's motives.

  8. American Brake Shoe v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    244 F.2d 489 (7th Cir. 1957)   Cited 9 times
    In American Brake Shoe Co. v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 244 F.2d 489, we recognized that the right to engage in a lawful strike is a protected concerted activity.

  9. Utah Plumbing and Heating Con. v. N.L.R.B

    294 F.2d 165 (10th Cir. 1961)   Cited 5 times

    No. 6617. August 24, 1961. Louis H. Callister, Salt Lake City, Utah (Callister Fullmer, Salt Lake City, Utah, were with him on the brief), for petitioner. Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C., were with her on the brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. BRATTON, Circuit Judge. Utah Plumbing and Heating Contractors Association, with its principal